U.S. Marijuana Ruling Could Signal End of Prohibition on Pot

by Colleen Curry, World News

colorado hempfest doritos

It’s legal to light up in Colorado and Washington, and soon smoking pot could be legalized across the country following a decision Thursday by the federal government.

After Washington state and Colorado passed laws in November 2012 legalizing the consumption and sale of marijuana for adults over 18, lawmakers in both states waited to see whether the federal government would continue to prosecute pot crimes under federal statutes in their states.

Both Colorado and Washington have been working to set up regulatory systems in order to license and tax marijuana growers and retail sellers, but have been wary of whether federal prosecutors would come after them for doing so. They are the first states to legalize pot, and therefore to go through the process of trying to set up a regulatory system.

Consumption and sale of marijuana is still illegal in all other states, though some cities and towns have passed local laws decriminalizing it or making it a low priority for law enforcement officers. There are also movements in many states to legalize pot, including legalization bills introduced in Maine and Rhode Island, discussion of possible bills in states including Massachusetts and Vermont, and talk of ballot initiatives in California and Oregon.

But on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced that it would not prosecute marijuana crimes that were legal under state law, a move that could signal the end of the country’s longtime prohibition on pot is nearing. “It certainly appears to be potentially the beginning of the end,” said Paul Armantano, deputy director of the pot lobby group NORML.

The memo sent to states Thursday by the DOJ said that as long as states set up comprehensive regulations governing marijuana, there would be no need for the federal government to step in, a decision that will save the Justice Department from having to use its limited resources on prosecuting individuals for growing or smoking marijuana.

“This memo appears to be sending the message to states regarding marijuana prohibition that is a recognition that a majority of the public and in some states majority of lawmakers no longer want to continue down the road of illegal cannabis, and would rather experiment with different regulatory schemes of license and retail sale of cannabis,” Armantano said.

Richard Collins, a law professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, said that the memo from the DOJ points out specifically that the federal government will only walk away from marijuana crimes in states where there is a solid regulatory system for the drug’s growth and disemenation.

For other states to mimic the systems in Colorado and Washington, they will first have to get legalization laws on their ballots or in their state houses, which could post a challenge, he said.

While Colorado and Washington have not yet set up their regulatory systems, both states will likely sell licenses to farmers who want to grow marijuana as well as to manufacturing plants and retail sellers. The marijuana will also likely be taxed at each stage of its growth, processing, and sale.

“In both Colorado and Washington, legalization was done by citizens with no participation by elected representatives until they had to pass laws to comply with the initiative. In other initiative states I would expect such measures – I would expect a new one in California, for instance – and roughly half the states permit this and the rest don’t.

“In the states that do have initiatives I expect efforts to get it on the ballot. The other half it will be much tougher. It’s hard to get elected representatives to do this,” Collins said.

Armantano is more optimistic about the spread of legalized pot. He compared the DOJ’s announcement to the federal government’s actions toward the end of alcohol prohibition in America a century ago, when states decided to stop following the federal ban on alcohol sales and the federal government said it would not step in and prosecute crimes.

“For first time we now have clear message from fed government saying they will not stand in way of states that wish to implement alternative regulatory schemes in lieu of federal prohibition,” Armantano said.

He predicted that within the next one to three years, five or six other states may join Colorado and Washington in legalizing the drug, setting the stage for the rest of the country to follow.

Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, the nation’s largest police union, was disappointed with the Justice Department’s decision, but said that he had already reached out to set up meetings to talk with leadership in the department and he was “open to discussion” about the benefits.

“I would tell you that certainly the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers oppose legalization,” he said, “but that is not to say that we’re not willing to have a conversation about it. It is, from our perspective, a gateway drug and opinions to the contrary don’t have the weight of fact behind them.”

“We want to talk to (the DOJ) about their thought process and ours and where the disconnect is,” he said. “From our perspective the only fault with the status quo is that we aren’t making a bigger dent and we’d like to make a bigger one.”

1 comment to U.S. Marijuana Ruling Could Signal End of Prohibition on Pot

  • greg

    that statement about dents is bogus! DOJ is merely standing by while patriots find holes in your corrupting system, cannabis is a gateway, a gateway to good healthy life styles, now if you want to attack state officials bring your top of the flag pole attitude over to the east coast, dover Delaware, the narcotic prescription pills are the topic of conversation here, but you never see a politician after none of the multi-million dollar pill companies, while they influence the young, while taking lives daily taken as the are recommended you tell me where your thought process and my thought process is and where that disconnect is! I see what is going on, this is a diversion to draw eyes over here while the real action is in the opposite direction trick, these wars and this cannabis story it is good its not good tomorrow it may be legal, and the point being politicians in this country that deemed it illegal should be lined against the wall as our tax payers money pays military to do, enough said, the court system and everyone with something to do with it are murderers as the keep natural meds a secret or illegal, there is no to ways, if I don’t treat a dog I leave him pinned up and it dies I go to jail! the government makes us jump through hoops to get their cut out of a herb many can grow themselves, do you not hear this? jim pasco I want all the amount of taxes you paid in last year as tax! that’s stupid right! what the hell do I owe anyone anything if I grow my own, I did the work, paid for the equip(if any used) I paid for the buffers(if outside soil) I paid for the seeds, I paid for the water, I paid for the taxes on all that shit, now I hurt the first person that tries to take anything from my supper table just because I paid my way to the point of harvest, go back and see how many ‘I’s’ you count as opposed to jim’s before paid! and think someone wont get hurt cause jim wants something from my hard work, the slave beat a “nigger” days are long gone, and I notice the up in military and the old military retiring with early benefits and all the new young boys, don’t think all those hillbillies I know are going soft besides eyes will be wide open when someone’s neighbor is killing someone’s son because their constitutional rights are being broken in an act of sedition or treason against the great men who wrote them! and about that time hemp was being grown for Britan to make paper and clothes and such, and also has had patents on automobiles fibers ect. also in the early 1900’s, 30’s I do believe it was reported to stop the growth of tumor cells and revert them into a state to kill themselves as a reaction to the CBD, so all of this sounds like treason to our great country to me, or maybe sedition it doesn’t sound fair to the people and I thought I was thought this nation was for the people by the people under god, unless it was an institution I went to and wasn’t for the people at all? maybe we are closer to the rule of Hitler, the preservatives in the food aren’t burning people but its headed that way and its governed law we are to be “schooled” what ever, or parents will experience repercussions, well I remember the second amendment what’s the deal? was school to teach me or program me? we don’t live for god as American’s when our leaders pick themselves and lost their morals slowly our nation will also, and as doing so we are losing America, as it looks I don’t think the people had it in the first place, really how many presidents are related?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  

  

  

Instagram Feed

Something is wrong. Response takes too long or there is JS error. Press Ctrl+Shift+J or Cmd+Shift+J on a Mac.